Chapter Five
Logic: Thinking God’s Thoughts After Him
One of the clearest dividing lines between man and the animal world is our ability to think and to reason. We know from Scripture that all men and women are made in the image of God. God is the giver of every good and perfect gift to man. John proclaimed that Christ is “the true Light which gives light to every man.” Gordon Clark, in his tremendous textbook on the subject of logic, deduces from this verse that Jesus Christ has given every man and woman the light of logic. God created men and women to think in a rational, logical way. The theory of logic is imbedded in our being. A newborn baby is born with the theory of logic already working in his mind, which is the very image of God. David wrote that the Lord taught him “wisdom in the inmost place.” A child forms premises, constructs arguments, and draws conclusions. However, the dog that the child pets does not have that uniquely human ability, nor can it ever be trained to think in the same way a human being thinks. This is because the child -- and not the dog -- is made in the image of God.
Towards the end of his life, the apostle Paul stood in the city of Caesarea, speaking to Festus, the governor, and King Agrippa, and a roomful of onlookers. Paul boldly gave his testimony:
“Therefore, having obtained help from God, to this day I stand, witnessing both to small and great, saying no other things than those which the prophets and Moses said would come ‑‑ that the Christ would suffer, that He would be the first to rise from the dead, and would proclaim light to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles.” Now as he thus made his defense, Festus said with a loud voice, “Paul, you are beside yourself! Much learning is driving you mad!” But he said, “I am not mad, most noble Festus, but speak the words of truth and reason.”
Notice how the Holy Spirit directed Paul to link the words truth and reason together! Historical, biblical Christianity claims that God is the God of all truth, but it also claims that God is the God of all reason, i.e., logic and wisdom. If we believe in the unity of the Godhead, we cannot separate the one attribute from the other. We cannot segregate the attributes of God as if they exist independently of one another. All the attributes of God complete the essence of God, and they have existed eternally in a harmonious, balanced, and interdependent relationship to each other. Consequently, a knowledge of God as the God of all truth cannot exist without the knowledge that God has simultaneously and eternally been the God of all reason. That is why Paul would place truth and reason strategically beside one another in defense of his sanity, because both of these words have their origin in the mind of God. Hence truth and reason form the only basis for human sanity.
What is Logic?
This chapter was written to teach you how to reason from God's truth, like Paul, by utilizing the principles of logic. Logic is defined as “the science of necessary inference,” or if you prefer, the science of necessary conclusions. More simply, logic is a system of rules which enable us to reach accurate (necessary) conclusions. Just as mathematics gives us the system of thinking that allows us to reach the correct (necessary) answers when working with numbers, logic gives us the ability to reach the necessary conclusions when working with ideas.
In this book, I have devoted two chapters to truth. We saw that the Bible is our axiom, the starting point for all truth. Scripture alone is our one trustworthy, unimpeachable source of all truth and wisdom. As you read the Word of God, you see that the Bible is the logic of God. The Bible is the only book ever written that displays perfect, flawless logic. The sixty-six books of Scripture are the necessary conclusions from the eternal mind of God. Now that we know that we are in the possession of truth -- the inspired, inerrant Word of God -- we must learn to reason correctly from truth. In an upcoming chapter, we will move into the field of metaphysics (pronounced “met ah fizz iks”), which is the study of ultimate meaning and ultimate reality. But we cannot approach any other discipline until we have learned to make correct deductions from the irrefutable truths of God’s Word.
Do you see how this kind of reasoning differs from man’s usual pattern of thought? Many of us reason by induction. We use a few particular things to form our broader conclusions. We observe this, and we experience that, and we form our general conclusions about truth from these few particulars of sensation and experience. In other words, we are seeking to discover truth based on our observations and/or experiments.
For example, if we were speaking to someone who claimed to be an atheist, we might well point to all the things we see in creation, such as the myriad forms of plant and animal life, the ingenious construction of the human eye, or the incredibly complex integration of various ecosystems. We would say, “Mr. Unbeliever, you see all this complexity in men and in nature. Surely this couldn’t possibly have evolved by chance! It’s like thinking that a tornado could churn through a junkyard and whip up a 747! Wouldn’t you agree that for every effect, there must be a cause? Therefore, for every creation there must be a Creator.”
You are asking the unbeliever to draw his broad conclusion from a few specifics - toreason inductively. The God of the Bible is not a conclusion drawn from specifics. His Word is the starting point. We do not inductively reason our way to God. Rather, we reason from God’s revelation concerning Himself. We have no need to use induction to discover truth, because we are already in possession of the one and only comprehensive body of truth available to mankind: the Bible.
Satan would have us attempt to reason inductively to discover “truth.” He is “the god of this world,” and induction is the world’s method of reasoning. We have already seen how Satan duped Adam and Eve into abandoning the truth of God’s revelation and trusting their own perceptions instead. Satan thought to exalt himself above the throne of God, and he would have us exalt man’s reasoning above God’s revelation. Paul urged Timothy, “Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babble and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge‑‑by professing it some have strayed concerning the faith.” We are to avoid the inductive reasoning of the world, for this is only profane and idle babbling. This babbling is falsely called knowledge by the “wise men” of this world, and by following after this false, inductive reasoning some have strayed from the grace and knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ. Adam and Eve were Satan’s first victims--but they were by no means the last!
Inductive reasoning outside of Scripture never leads to knowledge, because we are reasoning outside of the complete system of truth that is God’s Word. Inductive reasoning within Scripture is a bona fide system of discovering knowledge within the whole system of truth: the Bible.
Science, for example, utilizes inductive reasoning exclusively. I want to hasten to interject here that science has been tremendously beneficial to our lives. Brilliant men and women have discovered wonderful things, and the benefits that we enjoy from everything that science has contributed -- from a cure for malaria, to refrigeration, to satellite technology — have improved the quality of our everyday lives immeasurably. However, I must also assert just as firmly that science in and of itself will never lead us to truth. This is because inductive reasoning starts with the pieces and tries to work toward the whole. Let me give you an illustration that will bring the point home.
Imagine that you are trying to discover the truth about the man Michelangelo. Where would you begin? The inductive thinker would begin to investigate Michelangelo’s work. He would visit the Sistine chapel and examine the paintings, sketches, and sculptures that this man created. Based upon the work Michelangelo had done, the inductive thinker would begin to draw conclusions about the man. To make the analogy more exacting, the inductive reasoner might well climb to the ceiling of the Sistine chapel, examine a few tiny brush strokes, and proclaim, “I can tell you a great deal about what kind of a man Michelangelo was.”
Sounds silly, doesn’t it? But this is the way of science. Imagine that I have a large color picture of the ceiling of the Sistine chapel. I make a black and white photocopy of that picture, and then painstakingly cut that facsimile into 5 million tiny pieces. I hand all 5 million pieces to my daughter. “Here, sweetheart. I want you to begin putting these together.” I don’t give her the original color picture to work from, so the task seems a hopeless one. However, my daughter is a remarkably persistent and industrious young lady, and she grits her teeth and gets to work. After months of painstaking labor, she has assembled 5,000 of the 5 million pieces. I come along to check on her progress. “You’re doing well, honey. Now, based on what you’ve put together here, what can you tell me about the Sistine chapel?” Remember that she does not have the entire full-color picture. All she has is .001% of the whole picture — a tiny fraction. Can she now give me the truth of the whole panorama of the Sistine chapel? Of course not. Can she use that fragment of the big picture to tell me about Michelangelo? Can she tell me if Michelangelo was a moral man? Will she know if he liked his neighbors? Can she assert that Michelangelo thought the Bible was the Word of God? Impossible!
Yet this is the way of inductive reasoning. Christian’s often stumble into this same trap. We carefully examine a pile of twigs, and seek to reason our way to the Trinity. This school of thinking is called the evidentialist school of theology. The inductive reasoning that scientists and evidentialists use can only provide us with information. Much of that information has been tremendously useful and beneficial to society, but it does not produce truth and knowledge. Induction and evidentialism provide hypothesis -- an “educated guess” at what truth might be. They proclaim the human viewpoint. The Bible, on the other hand, reveals the divine viewpoint, and we can reason our way to knowledge only by beginning with the divine viewpoint. Likewise, the only way my daughter can come to a full understanding of Michelangelo is to start with the whole: the man himself. She would have to read his autobiography, in which he clearly stated his system of ethics, how he felt about his neighbors and about the Bible, and so on. Otherwise, she will only be able to determine a few bits of information about the man.
Christian men and women should reason by deduction. Rather than seeking to discover truth on the basis of a few particulars, we should begin with the complete system of truth, and work out the specifics from there. In practice, this means drawing our specific conclusions from God’s Word. We return to our axiom: The Bible alone is the Word of God. This is our system of truth, and if we reason from truth, then the specific conclusions we draw will be accurate. This is called the presuppositionalist school of theology. This thinking presupposes the whole system of revelation -- God’s Word -- to be the only reliable source for knowing and communicating truth. If, on the other hand, we seek to employ the specific observations and/or experiences of men (both of which are skewed by sin) as the foundation for our thinking, we are going to draw broad conclusions which are wrong - sinful.
Are There Two Systems of Logic?
It is important for us to recognize that God created us to understand His truth. There are those who point to Isaiah 55:8-9 (“‘My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways My ways,’” says the Lord. “‘For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.’”) and say that it is impossible for us to know the thoughts of God. They believe that God is so wise and transcendent, and resides on such an intellectual mountaintop compared to the insignificant anthill of man’s knowledge, that man is incapable of knowing and understanding the logic of God. Such reasoning would lead one to believe that there are two systems of logic: man’s feeble thinking, and God’s lofty ruminations which are on a plane incomprehensible to us.
Gordon Clark shredded this assumption. Clark wrote, “To me, the tremendous assumption without warrant from Scripture is that God is incapable of expressing the truth he knows.” In other words, the notion that God does not communicate truth and knowledge that man can understand is not borne out by the Scriptures. Dr. Clark points out that the entire body of Scripture is a revelation of organized, propositional, logical sentences. We read in John 1 that Jesus Christ is the Word of God. The Greek word that is translated “Word” in John 1:1 is “logos,” from which we draw our English word “logic.” One could translate John 1:1 with perfect accuracy as reading, “In the beginning was the divine Logic, and the divine Logic was with God, and the divine Logic was God.”Dr. Clark also approved of the rendering of logos as “Wisdom.” Jesus Christ is the divine Wisdom, the living Word that came from God.
We are urged throughout the Old Testament to seek after wisdom. In fact, Proverbs asserts, “Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Though it cost all you have, get understanding.” Would God command us to spend our all on that which is unknown and unknowable? I think not. Are there things which God has chosen not to reveal to us, which we cannot understand? Of course. God’s knowledge of the universe is infinite and exhaustive, and some of that knowledge is, indeed, beyond my comprehension. Scripture tells us that “The secret things belong to the Lord our God.” The Holy Spirit of God inspired Peter to write that in Scripture there are “some things hard to understand.” Notice, however, that He did not say that they are impossible to understand.
Is the entire body of Scripture written on a plane that man cannot comprehend, as some so-called theologians claim? Absolutely not! The Bible is God’s direct revelation of His eternal sovereign plan in the universe and in the lives of men and angels, for His glory. He fully intends for His people to understand His Word. You’ve all heard that glorious invitation, “‘Come now, and let us reason together,’ says the Lord.” We can only reason with God if He has communicated truth to us that we can comprehend. Indeed, God has given us knowledge, and it is knowledge which we can understand and digest. However, my knowledge of God’s truth is not exhaustive. For example, it is true that I can’t exhaustively understand the doctrine of justification: that I, a vile, rotten sinner have been declared “Righteous” in the sight of Holy God. (More on that in an upcoming chapter.) I cannot comprehend -- to the same degree that God does -- the truth that when God the Father looks at me, He does not see a sinful man, but rather He sees the imputed righteousness of His Son, Jesus Christ. It is true that there are depths of this knowledge which lie beyond my finite, human understanding. But I do understand the truth of this doctrine. God has expressed this truth in orderly, grammatical form in the Holy Scriptures, and I can know -without question or confusion - the words and ideas that express this doctrine and know that it is true. The doctrine of justification that God has in His mind has been accurately communicated to you and me through Scripture. The thoughts God has about justification are the same thoughts that you and I have. There is an identity of mind. Consequently, it necessarily follows that there is also an identity of truth. When we have properly digested the doctrine of justification, God’s thoughts are our thoughts! There is a convergence of understanding, a common meaning, and the Scripture is true: “We have the mind of Christ.” Therefore, there is only one system of logic, not two, and this one system of logic has been revealed to us by God’s Word so that we may comprehend and think His thoughts after Him and know His truth, as the Holy Spirit enlightens us.
There is another logical blunder that is committed by those skeptics who deny the validity of human words and human logic. If, as the skeptics say, words are inadequate and logic is invalid, then they could not formulate their views to attack their opponents, because they must use human words and human logic to construct their arguments. As soon as we assert anything, we are simultaneously asserting the existence, necessity, and indisputableness of logic. Moreover, to support the validity of human logic and human language, we know logical argument and logical inferences are legitimate because the Holy Spirit uses these reasoning tools throughout the entirety of Scripture. We also know human language is legitimate by the Holy Spirit writing the Bible in the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek languages to reveal God’s truth to His people.
Reasoning From the Scriptures
Luke recounted how the apostle Paul, “went in to (the synagogue), and for three Sabbaths reasoned with (the Jews) from the Scriptures, explaining and demonstrating that ... ‘This Jesus whom I preach to you is the Christ.’” And we see that “Some of them were persuaded ...” These unbelievers were not swayed by some emotional appeal; they did not make a visceral, “gut” decision. Instead they were “persuaded” by Paul’s clear reasoning from the truth of the Scriptures. Paul formed his premises, constructed his arguments, and developed his conclusions from biblical truth.
Paul’s pattern mirrored that of Jesus Christ. Jesus spoke human words and used human logic, which came from the eternal mind of God. We have already seen how Jesus clearly and consistently used the Scriptures as the foundation and authority for His entire ministry here on earth. This is the pattern we should follow also -- using the Word of God as our axiom for everything we say and do. Just as Paul did in the synagogue, we, too, should reason and draw our conclusions from the Scriptures.
Tragically, this is precisely what the heart of sinful man refuses to do. Jesus told the terrible story of the rich man who died and went to hell. “And being in torments in Hades,” Jesus recounted, “He lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. Then he cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.’”
Abraham’s reply is grim: “Between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.”
Recognizing that his own fate is sealed, the rich man pleads for his family: “I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father's house, for I have five brothers, that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.”
Again, Abraham denies his request. “'They have Moses and the prophets [the Scriptures]; let them hear them.”
And even in spite of suffering the tortures of the damned, the rich man echoes humanity’s rebellion down through the ages: “No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.”
The rich man wants his brothers to be spared the agony he is suffering, and he pleads with Abraham to send a messenger to warn them. Abraham responds that the message had been delivered hundreds of years before, in the form of the completed manuscripts of the Old Testament -- Moses and the prophets. The Old Testament clearly warned that those who rejected the Word and the will of God would suffer eternal death and separation from God. Does the rich man gratefully recall that, indeed, his brothers already possess the keys to salvation? “No, Father Abraham”!He refuses to acknowledge the truth contained in the Scriptures! Instead, he insists that the only witness capable of convincing his brothers of the need for repentance is a sign, a walking dead man! The truths contained in Scripture are insufficient to lead us to God, the world says. We must have a sign, something that we can see and touch and measure and experience. This poor, blind, doomed, man was by no means the only one to succumb to this reasoning. We hear it echoed by the religious leaders of Jesus’ day: “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” Jesus replied with some disgust: “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, and no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.”
Even Jesus’ apostles, the men who had traveled with Jesus for three years and drank in His teaching day after day, echoed the “wisdom” of the world: “Philip said to Him, ‘Lord, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for us.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, “Show us the Father”? Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me does the works.’”
Time and time again, the Lord God Almighty has commanded us to listen to His words:
Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write these words, for according to the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.” (Exodus 34:27.)
“Therefore you shall lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes.” (Deuteronomy 11:18.)
“Truly the LORD has sent me to you to speak all these words in your hearing.” (Jeremiah 26:15.)
Thus says the Lord of hosts: “Let your hands be strong, you who have been hearing in these days these words by the mouth of the prophets ...” (Zechariah 8:9.)
“Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock ...” (Matthew 7:24.)
“If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him.” (John 14:23.)
And time and time again, we see sinful man rejecting the Word of God, and seeking after that which he can see and touch and measure and experience. Truly, as Abraham said to the rich man in hell, “If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.”
God has given us His inerrant, inspired, infallible, Word. Yet all too often, man rejects God’s Word, and relies on his depraved, deceitful sensation and experience. He disdains the solid rock of revelation, and leaps onto the ever-shifting sand of man’s experience instead. “No, Father Abraham.” Oh, how man’s blindness and rebellion are expressed in those few tragic, bitter words!
Source, Means, and End
We should always consider the source, means, and end of our own thinking, and of the thinking of those who are speaking to us. Our reasoning is valid and godly when we employ God’s revelation as the source of all truth; deduction as the means of thinking; and the end (desired point of conclusion) of our thoughts is the glory of God. If we consistently employ this kind of divine logic, we will succeed in thinking God’s thoughts after Him. All too often, however, man is prone to invalid and godless reasoning. This, of course, is the consistent pattern of thought for the unbeliever. Invalid reasoning employs sensation and experimentation as its source; induction is the means of thinking, and the inevitable end of such thought is idolatry--the glory of some man-made god. The people of Israel surrendered to this godless pattern of thinking, as was recorded in the somber words of the book of Judges: “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” If we have not allowed Jesus Christ to be Lord and King of our lives, and if God’s Word is not the source of our thinking, we will consistently follow after the sinful dictates of our own hearts. “There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death,” Proverbs warns. Another verse would seem to have been written for the United States in the year of the second millennium. “Where there is no revelation, the people cast off restraint.” The same Hebrew phrase is translated “the people were running wild” in Exodus 32:25 to describe the behavior of the people of Israel when they had turned from God to the worship of a golden calf. One need only scan the daily newspaper or flip on the nightly news to see a nation that has cast off virtually all restraint. Murder, mayhem, and madness are the inevitable results.
Any system of thought which does not use God’s revelation as its source and desire the glory of God for its end will necessarily lead to self-condemning, self-contradictory, and self-refuting conclusions. Only historical, biblical Christian thought avoids these false conclusions, for Christianity is truth, and truth is always self-coherent, self-consistent, self-attesting, and self-authenticating.
Why Study Logic?
The Bible actually commands the study of logic.“Come now, and let us reason together,” says the Lord. We are to reason with God. “Now therefore, stand still,” Samuel said to the people of Israel, “that I may reason with you before the Lord concerning all the righteous acts of the Lord ...” You don’t read anywhere in the Bible that the Lord or his prophet Samuel said, “Come, let us experience together,” or “Come, let us feel together,” but “Come, let us reason, let us think and speak logically together, that you may attain understanding and knowledge.” Jesus reasoned from the Scriptures constantly. Everywhere you look in the Gospels, you see the Savior reasoning: forming His premises, constructing His arguments, and developing His conclusions from the truth contained in Scripture.
In Jude 3, we are urged to “Contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.” How can we “always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that (we) have” if we do not recognize and construct a valid argument? How can we intelligently contend for our faith if we are unable to recognize an invalid argument from others? We should be “casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ.” We must demolish the intellectual fortresses that an unbelieving world has erected to resist the advance of God’s Word. We are to cast down (to “demolish”) every argument that claims to be wiser than the wisdom of God. This is not optional activity for the Christian believer! For today’s believer, it means that everything we hear on radio and television, everything that is said by educators, politicians, and social commentators, everything that the members of our family say -- “every thought” -- is to be brought in line with the thinking of the Lord Jesus Christ. We are commanded to think God’s thoughts after Him. I believe, then, that perhaps the best definition of the word logic is “thinking God’s thoughts after Him.” John Robbins has written that “The laws of logic are the way that God thinks. He makes no mistakes, draws no unwarranted conclusions, constructs no invalid arguments.” God’s mind IS logic. The laws of logic are the laws of godly thought! As we look to the sixty-six books of Scripture, we see that the Bible is God’s logic. We study logic so that we can bring our thinking into obedience to the commands of Scripture: to defend our faith, to contend for the faith, and to cast down the arguments against the faith. We cannot obey these commands intelligently and intelligibly without a fundamental knowledge of the rules of logic.
Time and time again, we see that this was the method of the apostle Paul when speaking with unbelievers. Several times in the book of Acts, we see that Paul reasoned with those with whom he was contending for the faith. Paul constructed logical arguments based entirely on the Scriptures. He was not trying to be argumentative; rather, he was seeking to persuade, and he was very successful! For example, we read that Paul “reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and with the Gentile worshipers, and in the marketplace daily with those who happened to be there.” Every day, Paul went into the houses of worship, and also into the streets, reasoning with both the devout and the ungodly and persuading them to acknowledge the truth.
Not only are we commanded by Scripture to reason logically from biblical truth, we see that great thinkers throughout history have insisted on logical thinking, as well. Martin Luther, when confronted by Dr. von Eck and ordered to recant his teaching on the doctrine of Sola fide (salvation by faith alone), replied firmly, “Unless I am refuted and convicted by testimonies of the Scriptures or by clear arguments ... , I am conquered by the Holy Scriptures quoted by me, and my conscience is bound in the Word of God: I can not and will not recant any thing.” It is important to recognize a point which all respected church historians agree on: when Luther said unless he was convicted by the Scriptures or “clear arguments,” he did not mean arguments based on the reasoning of man or the councils of the Roman church. He meant logically clear and cogent arguments which were directly deduced from God’s Word.
A modern-day theologian, Dr. R.C. Sproul, wrote, “I know of no seminary that requires the study of logic as a necessary tool for biblical interpretation. Yet I venture to guess that the single most frequently committed error in biblical exegesis and interpretation is an error in deduction. Wrong conclusions are reached because illegitimate inferences are made. We may master grammar, lexicography, and historical background and yet reach false conclusions because of errors in deduction. It is possible, indeed customary, to achieve a Ph.D. in almost every academic discipline there is without ever taking a single course in logic. The deductive side of education has been all but eclipsed.”
Abraham Kuyper would have approved of Dr. Sproul’s statement. He wrote, “A theologian who undervalues Logic, as being little necessary to him, simply disarms himself. This was by no means the practice of our older theologians. They always emphasized most strongly the study of formal logic, together with its related arts.” Dr. John Robbins has pointed out, “It is instructive to compare the curriculum of Harvard during the seventeenth century with the curriculum of any college or university today, Christian or pagan. Harvard College required 140 credit-hours of study--using the modern notation of one credit-hour per hour of class time per week--over a period of three years. Those 140 credit-hours were divided as follows: Logic and disputations {in Latin--30 hours; Greek--24 hours; Hebrew, Aramaic, and Syriac--24 hours; Rhetoric and declamation--24 hours; Theology--16 hours; Ethics and politics--8 hours; Arithmetic and geometry--6 hours; Physics--2 hours; Botany--2 hours; Astronomy--2 hours; History--2 hours. The student who successfully completed this curriculum was well educated.” As you can see, Logic was considered to be a very important component in completing the education of the students who attended Harvard. The whole focus of the college experience was placed on truth and reason!
Logic is the gift that God has given us to make explicit what is implicit in the Word of God. Logic allows us to take the truths that God has expressed to us and make them plain for all to see and understand. A perfect example of this use of logic is in the explanation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. We hear preaching and teaching on this all the time. Numerous books have been written on the relationship between the three Persons of the Trinity. Yet, some people are surprised to learn that if you searched a concordance, you would find that the word “Trinity” does not appear anywhere in either the Old or the New Testaments. The doctrine of the Trinity is one of the most fundamental of our faith. In fact, one of the major tip-offs to the teaching of any cult is a group that denies the deity of Jesus Christ, or seeks to place the Son in a position that is inferior to the Father in His divine essence. However, this great doctrine of our faith is one that is implicit in the Scriptures. It is never directly stated. Instead, theologians deduced the doctrine of the Trinity from the teaching of the Scripture. They read verses such as Acts 5:3-4, where Peter said that lying to the Holy Spirit was lying to God. Therefore, the Holy Spirit is God. Then they looked to Romans 9:5, and read that “Christ ... is God over all.” Ephesians 4:6 clearly states that the Father is God. Add to the mix the clear teaching of Scripture that “The Lord is one,” and the only possible logical deduction is the great teaching of “God in three Persons, blessed Trinity.” This is the kind of “clear argument” that Martin Luther respected. It is a necessary conclusion drawn directly from Scripture.
The greatest of the church creeds, which was the foundational document for the Presbyterian Church (though liberal branches have veered radically away from it) is the Westminster Confession. Section VI of the Confession states:
The whole counsel of God, concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man’s salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture: unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit or traditions of men.
Note the expression that “all things necessary” to understand God, His plan of salvation, faith, and life, are either “expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture.” Here again, we see the need for the science of logic, a discipline which sets down the rules which bring us to accurate, necessary conclusions and enable us to truly think God’s thoughts after Him.
One of the most influential theologians in church history, Augustine, said, “The science of reasoning is of very great service in searching into and unraveling all sorts of questions that come up in Scripture ... The validity of logical sequences is not a thing devised by men, but it is observed and noted by them that they may be able to learn and teach it; for it exists eternally in the reason of things, and has its origin with God.” The great church historian Philip Schaff called John Calvin “the best theologian and exegete among the Reformers” and said that Calvin “assigned (reason) the office of an indispensable handmaid of revelation.” Calvin set himself to the study and mastery of Logic, seeing it as indispensable to the proper understanding of Scripture. Indeed, the great modern theologian, Dr. Benjamin Warfield, wrote that “No (doctrine) is ascertained or formulated without the aid of human logic.”
What we miss so often, when we are thinking on and discussing the concepts of truth, wisdom, and knowledge, is that the laws of logic are inherent in all these. The laws of logic are inseparable from the concepts of truth, wisdom, and knowledge! As Augustine said, the laws of logic were not devised by men, but rather existed eternally with God! How, then, can we have “irrational”truth? How could we have “illogical” knowledge? How can we have an “anti-intellectual” wisdom? It is impossible. The words cannot coexist in the same phrase. They form an oxymoron, a linguistic contradiction.
How can we, as followers of Jesus Christ, mount an anti-intellectual defense of our faith? Is there such a thing as “ignorant obedience”? How can we trust in God if we do not understand Him? “A man who has riches without understanding is like the beasts that perish,” Scripture asserts. Time and again, Paul wrote to Christian believers, “I do not want you to be ignorant.” The great lament of God, given through the prophet Hosea, was “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”
All too often today, we see ignorance held up as a virtue. A great deal of the entertainment in our popular culture today follows the theme of the movie “Dumb and Dumber.” We are amused by mindlessness. (Take a look at the roots of the word amuse: a means “no,” and muse means “think,” so the word amuse literally means no think!) Television has taught us to think -- when we do -- in random, staccato bursts, and we become bored and impatient with critical thinking which is developed within the framework of logic, thinking which we often find difficult to grasp. Tragically, this mental laziness does not only infect our leisure time. J. Gresham Machen wrote:
The ignorance of the Church is explained by the failure of the Christian family as an educational institution; but what in turn explains that failure? Why is it that Christian parents have neglected the instruction of their children; why is it that preaching has ceased to be educational and doctrinal; why is it that even Sunday Schools and Bible classes have come to consider solely applications of Christianity without studying the Christianity that is to be applied? These questions take us into the very heart of the situation; the growth of ignorance in the Church, the growth of indifference with regard to the simple facts recorded in the Bible, all goes back to a great spiritual movement, really skeptical in its tendency, which has been going forward during the last one hundred years — a movement which appears not only in philosophers and theologians such as Kant and Schleiermacher and Ritschl, but also in a widespread attitude of plain men and women throughout the world. The depreciation of the intellect, with the exaltation in the place of it of the feelings or of the will, is, we think, a basic fact in modern life, which is rapidly leading to a condition in which men neither know anything nor care anything about the doctrinal content of the Christian religion, and in which there is in general a lamentable intellectual decline.”
But God does not bless ignorance. “Come now, let us reason together,” He has said. God wants us to think and to reason. The image of omniscience is not ignorance! God does not honor unwarranted conclusions. “It is not good to have zeal without knowledge,” Proverbs cautions.
The mother of Samuel proclaimed that “The Lord is the God of knowledge; and by Him actions are weighed.” Paul urged Timothy to “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” We are to study so we can correctly understand and explain God’s Word. The highest calling of Christianity is to “Grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”
Godliness is right thinking!
How can you obey God’s Word, unless you properly understand, i.e., unless you can “rightly divide” it? One of the most basic laws of logic states that words have a specific meaning. This is expressed by the first law of logic, which is also known as the law of contradiction. Aristotle expressed the law of contradiction thus: “The same attribute cannot at the same time belong and not belong to the same subject and in the same respect.” For example, a line cannot be both curved and straight at the same time. Different portions of the line may be both curved and straight, but it cannot be both curved and straight in the same respect. This same law of contradiction applies to words. In order for a word to mean something, it must also not mean something. “Dog” can not mean “fence.” “Thou shalt not steal” can not mean “Thou may steal.”
Dr. John Robbins asserts that the law of contradiction directly links logic with morality:
When the Bible says, You shall not covet, each word has a specific meaning. Attacking logic means attacking morality. If logic is disdained, then the distinctions between right and wrong, good and evil, just and unjust, merciful and ruthless also disappear ... The rejection of logic has become very popular in the 20th century. In matters of morality, one frequently hears that “There are no blacks and whites, only shades of gray.” What this means is that there is no good or evil; all actions and alternatives are mixtures of good and evil. If one abandons logic, as many people in this century have, then one cannot distinguish good from evil — and everything is permitted ... The rejection of logic has led — and must lead — to the abandonment of morality.
If we reject logic, then there can be no truth, because words become meaningless! We have no way to identify — for our children, for our communities, or for our nation — good and evil because those words no longer have any meaning. And so we see in the United States that the killing of the unborn has become a “constitutional right,” but prayers offered to the Almighty in the government schools is considered an abomination. Homosexual marriage is held up by the cultural elites as good and decent and progressive, while those who proclaim God’s truth that homosexuality is an abomination are labeled as hateful, bigoted extremists. Now that words like “right” and “wrong” have lost their meaning, the United States has become a nation that calls evil good, and good evil.
The writer of Hebrews wrote that “Solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.” We must train our minds, through the constant, consistent use of logic, to think in such a clear, non-contradictory way that we are able to embrace morality, and rightly divide what is good from what is evil. Then we are thinking God’s thoughts after Him, and then we are reasoning properly, which is the basis for godliness.
The Primacy of Wisdom
I want to place great emphasis on the phrase, “The wisdom of God.” Logic IS the wisdom of God. Godly, rational thought is His logic, His wisdom, His thought. Our Heavenly Father urges us, “ My son, be wise, and make my heart glad.” King David taught his son Solomon, “Do not forsake wisdom, and she will protect you; love her, and she will watch over you. Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Though it cost all you have, get understanding.” Recall that God offered Solomon anything he wanted, and Solomon asked for wisdom. “And God gave Solomon wisdom and exceedingly great understanding, and largeness of heart like the sand on the seashore. Thus Solomon's wisdom excelled the wisdom of all the men of the East and all the wisdom of Egypt. For he was wiser than all men ... And men of all nations, from all the kings of the earth who had heard of his wisdom, came to hear the wisdom of Solomon.”
The Scripture tells us that wisdom is supreme! Above all else that we seek, we are to earnestly seek and pursue wisdom. James wrote that “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all liberally and without reproach, and it will be given to him.” When we ask for wisdom, we are really asking for more of Christ, “who became for us wisdom from God,” and “in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” It was Paul’s prayer for all believers“that your love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that you may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless until the day of Christ.” Jesus is the Logos, the Word, the Divine Wisdom. To grow in God’s knowledge is to grow in Christ.
The Thoughts of Man
Does my heart love logic? Do I thrill to the idea of thinking God’s thoughts after Him? If I am an unsaved man or woman, the answer is absolutely NO! “The mind of sinful man ... is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do so.” Man loves sin, and sin is insanity. The thoughts of the unbeliever are completely distorted by the sinful nature. He resists God’s thoughts! He rebels against truth and logic. If I, as a man who is living in hostility to God, strive to think God’s thoughts after Him, that makes me responsible and accountable to God. I become dependent on Him for my very purpose in life, and for all my goodness and righteousness, for “All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags.” I, the unbeliever, have bought into Satan’s lie in the garden, and I desire to be like God, knowing good and evil. I want to proclaim what is truth; I want to call the shots; I want to be “The Captain of My Ship,” “The Master of My Fate,” etc. My focus is completely on the gratification and glorification of self. I have absolutely no desire to place my life and my destiny in the hands of another, particularly in the hands of a God whom I cannot see, but must rely on by faith. I have no desire to think biblically or rationally. My thoughts are in-sane, because they are hostile to God’s truth.
It is only when I have become a part of that plan, and trusted in the redeeming work of Jesus Christ on Calvary’s cross, and only when I have the Holy Spirit of God living within me that I can even begin to “take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.” I do this by guarding my mind with a detachment of mighty centurions, the sixty-six books of God’s inspired, inerrant Word. These sturdy bulwarks of God’s truth should be placed around my mind, guarding my thoughts. They are the garrison which protects my mind. God has a plan of salvation. Salvation is logical. Salvation is rational. It is expressed in logical, truthful propositions. If Satan attacks with his apostasy and his unbelief, I unlimber “The sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,” and firmly reply, as my Savior did, “It is written ... It is written ... Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” Then we will truly become like the mighty men of Scripture, and “Demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God.” We can reject the doctrines of demons, and quote book, chapter, and verse to defeat our deadly adversary. This is how we are to think; this is how we are to reason; and this is how we live a life that truly gives glory to God!
The Times Are Evil
You certainly aren’t going to see the cultural bastions of Western civilization encouraging this kind of rational, biblical thinking. Francis Schaeffer said that the United States had entered a post-Christian era. Josh McDowell has defined our age more accurately as an anti-Christian era. It is certainly an anti-intellectual era. You see the dumbing-down of every area of our culture -- from art, to entertainment, to our horrendous educational system, to politics, and even to the pulpit, as was described so accurately by J. Gresham Machen.
Dear Reader, if anyone should labor to develop a clear, erudite mind and learn to speak with pure, unadulterated logic and rational thought, it is you and I, the bond servants of Christ! By God’s grace, our disciplined study of logic will enable us to reason so compellingly that our listeners will hear and understand the necessary, irrefutable conclusions we have developed, and will be convicted by the expression of God’s truth. Our listeners should be like those who heard Stephen’s great sermon in the days of the early church, and were “cut to the heart” by Steven’s inspired, inexorable logic. They “could not stand up against his wisdom or the Spirit by whom he spoke.” Dear reader, let me urge you to strive to be like Stephen! We should be the brightest, the most articulate, and the most intellectually challenging people on the planet, because we have the mind of Christ! We should “Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you,” and we should offer our defense of the faith — not based on our feelings or our experiences — but rather on the indisputable logic that is revealed in God’s Word. We should think and reason like no one else!
Contrary to what today’s humanist educators will tell you, the Bible is the most intellectually challenging book on the planet. The reader is introduced to the infinite, eternal mind of the God of the universe. His is a mind of eternal truth, logic, and wisdom. Wisdom is not an abstract philosophical concept! God is wisdom. He expresses His wisdom in words we can learn and understand. “I have more insight than all my teachers, for I meditate on your statutes,” David wrote in his Psalm of praise to God’s Word. “I have more understanding than the elders, for I obey your precepts.” God gave Daniel and his three companions the gift of wisdom, and “in all matters of wisdom and understanding ..., (Nebuchadnezzar) found them ten times better” than all the mystics and advisors in his entire kingdom! Solomon prayed for wisdom, and God answered that prayer. He has promised in the book of James to do the same for us. God made Solomon wiser than any man; and men came from all over the world just to listen to Solomon construct his necessary conclusions, and to speak with the wisdom of God. That is what we are to aspire to! We must study diligently and pray fervently that God would make us ten times more intellectually engaging than those who disdain the knowledge of God!
The Nature of Biblical Knowledge
The claim of knowledge is the claim of truth, not error, falsehood, or fallacious reasoning. Therefore, the object of knowledge is truth, and truth is always propositional, logical, and consistent. Truth does not manifest itself in contradictions, equivocations, or unwarranted conclusions. Responsibility -- the ability to respond correctly to God and to man -- depends on knowledge. Responsibility is a function of knowledge. Reason enables me to understand God’s commands. Without reason, i.e., without the law of contradiction (which gives words specific meanings), no one would be able to understand God’s commands, and no one can consistently obey a command he or she cannot understand. So the essence of logic is truth. The outcome of logic is consistency. We have laid down the axiom: God’s revelation, which is infinite, objective, external, infallible truth. This truth is in contrast to the most flimsy and unreliable standards of knowledge: sensation, experimentation, and observation. These last three depend on sinful man to supply them, and they are finite, subjective, internal, and entirely fallible! Anything that comes out of man’s mouth — if it is not a Scriptural truth or directly deduced from Scripture — is profane and idle babbling, because it sets itself against the knowledge of God! It is self-condemning, because it is anti-God. It is a lie, because it is generated by the inductive reasoning that is spawned by Satan, who is the father of lies. When Satan got inside the minds of Adam and Eve, sin entered the world of humanity. Why? Because he induced them to reason improperly. From the moment Adam and Eve purposed to eat the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they had turned their backs on God’s revelation, and they were no longer thinking God’s thoughts after Him. They had become insane. Their reasoning was now twisted and distorted by sin. And so it has been ever since that dreadful moment of disobedience. Since that day, no man has been able to think and reason logically and rationally without sin distorting his thought processes, unless he is aided by the Scriptures and the Holy Spirit of God. “The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.” “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” We cannot rely on our thoughts or our feelings to provide us with truth. Only God can do that.
I hope by now you clearly understand the critical importance of logical speech and thought. As we progress through the rest of this book, you will discover how logic enables us to deduce truths for every aspect of life, both for the individual and for a society, from God’s Word. Logic is the all-important bridge between the Bible, our axiom for truth, and the great doctrines of our faith. I wrote this chapter in the hope that I would whet your appetite for a greater knowledge of logical principles and techniques. The next chapter will introduce you to the formal and informal principles and techniques of logic that will enable you to reason biblically and deductively.
Psalm 73:17-20; Proverbs 8:36; Daniel 12:20.
Isaiah 1:18 (emphasis added).
1 Samuel 12:7 (emphasis added).
Quoted in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, (Peabody, MA, Hendrickson Publishers, originally published 1888), Vol 7, pp. 304-305.
R.C. Sproul, “What the Duce Has Happened to Education and Other Trivia?”, Ligonier Ministries Table Talk, Volume 15, Number 2, February 1991, p.5. (Emphasis in original.)
Quoted in Elihu Carranza, Logic Workbook, (Unicoi, TN: The Trinity Foundation, 1992), p. 98.
Dr. John Robbins,“The Educational Establishment Versus Civilization,” The Trinity Review, Dec. 1997, p.3-4.
This is from Holy, Holy, Holy. Do we need permission, or is it public domain?
Quoted in Gordon H. Clark, What Do Presbyterians Believe, (Phillipsburg, NJ, Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, Copyright (c) 1956, 1965), 18.
Romans 11:25; 1 Corinthians 12:1; 1 Thessalonians 4:13.
J. Gresham Machen, What is Faith? (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1925), p.22-23.
2 Pet 3:18, emphasis added.
Isaiah 5:20 reads, “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; who put bitter for sweet, and sweet bitter.” Loosely paraphrased, woe to those who disdain the laws of logic!
Phil 1:9‑10 (NIV, emphasis added).
Gordon H. Clark, Logic, (Unicoi, TN: The Trinity Foundation, 1985), p. xi.
See Psalm.31:5; John 14:6.
See Daniel 2:20; Romans 16:27; Colossians 2:3; 1 Timothy 1;17.
Gordon H. Clark, Logic, (Unicoi, TN: The Trinity Foundation, copyright (c) 1985), p. 1.
Man also attempts to reason from non-biblical deduction, i.e., rationalism. Rationalism states that man can reason from a non-experiential, intellectual whole, which his mind inherently possesses, that is independent of biblical revelation.
Paul testified in Acts 20:27 that “I have not shunned to declare to you the whole counsel of God.” Psalm 119:160 declares that “The entirety of Your word is truth, and every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever.”
Clark, God’s Hammer: The Bible and Its Critics, p. 35 (emphasis added).
Gordon H. Clark, The Johannine Logos, (Unicoi, TN: The Trinity Foundation, copyright (c) 1972, 1989), pp. 18-19.
Clark, God’s Hammer, p. 106.
Dr. Clark expounded on this idea by stating, “Formal or not, the laws of logic are certainly true, and as Plato implied and as Aristotle explicitly said, a skeptic cannot propound his skepticism without using them.” Clark, A Christian View of Men and Things, p. 293.
Acts 17:2-4 (emphasis added).
|